ISTH Academy

Create Account Sign In
Inaccurate conclusions by Tang and colleagues
Author(s):
Yonatan Y. Greenstein
Affiliations:
Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Allergy and Rheumatology, Rutgers – New Jersey Medical School, University Hospital Building, Room I‐354B, 150 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ, 07103 United States
ISTH Academy. Y. Greenstein Y. 04/18/20; 293251
Yonatan Y. Greenstein
Yonatan Y. Greenstein
Contributions
Journal Abstract
Abstract
I read with interest the study by Tang and colleagues, published March 27, 2020, entitled “Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease patients with coagulopathy.” Unfortunately, this retrospective study came to conclusions that are inaccurate with the information provided. The authors use of the word “therapy” implies that patients were given therapeutic doses of anticoagulants, however, doses appear to be most consistent with prophylaxis dosing. The authors report that 94 patients received enoxaparin at 40‐60mg/day. They did not specify the route of administration, subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV), nor did they specify the percentage of patients that received which dose. The 40mg per day dose of enoxaparin given SC is the prophylactic dose. The 60mg per day IV dose would be therapeutic for patients weighing 40kg, not a typical weight for an adult patient.

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies