ISTH Academy

Create Account Sign In
Qualitative experiences, values, and decisional needs of patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism who suffer bleeding—“This pill will keep you alive tonight”
Author(s): ,
Philip S. Wells
Affiliations:
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
,
Dawn Stacey
Affiliations:
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
,
Yan Xu
Affiliations:
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Maria A. de Winter
Affiliations:
Department of Internal Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Maria de Winter, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
ISTH Academy. 02/01/24; 417430
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.

Access to Premium content is currently a membership benefit.

Click here to join ISTH or renew your membership.

You may also access ISTH content "anytime, anywhere" with the FREE ISTH Academy App for iOS and Android.
Journal Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)
Rate & Comment (0)
Background

Contemporary guidelines recommend extended-duration anticoagulation among patients with a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE). Little is known about whether this recommendation aligns with patient values after a bleeding complication.

Objectives

To explore the experiences, values, and decisional needs of patients with unprovoked VTE related to extended-duration treatment after an anticoagulant-associated bleed.

Methods

In this descriptive, qualitative study, face to face online semistructured interviews were conducted with patients with unprovoked VTE who had experienced bleeding and continued anticoagulant treatment in one academic hospital in Canada. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis to identify themes. Themes were mapped onto the Ottawa Decisional Support Framework to identify decisional needs.

Results

Between September and December 2021, 14 patients were interviewed (age 41-69 years; 9 females). Many patients were not aware of the option to stop anticoagulation and had limited understanding of the decision about treatment duration. Despite the negative quality-of-life impact of clinically relevant bleeding during VTE treatment, the majority continued anticoagulation due to emotional trauma of VTE diagnosis, a perception that bleeding would be more manageable than VTE recurrence, a desire to maintain a connection to subspecialty care or non-VTE related benefits (eg, cancer diagnosis, protection from COVID-19). Patients’ decisional needs included lack of choice awareness, inadequate support for participation, lack of personalized risk stratification, and inadequate information on monitoring and managing heavy menstrual bleeding.

Conclusion

Despite the impact of anticoagulant-associated bleeding on quality of life, patients preferred continuing with anticoagulation for reasons extending beyond secondary VTE prevention. Effective decision-support interventions are needed to address unmet decisional needs.

Abstract

Extended anticoagulant treatment is recommended after unprovoked venous thromboembolism. Patients who had venous thromboembolism and bleeding were interviewed about their experiences and decisional needs. Despite bleeding and its impact on quality of life, patients preferred continuing anticoagulation. Decision-support interventions are needed to address unmet decisional needs.

Code of conduct/disclaimer available in General Terms & Conditions

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies