ISTH Academy

Create Account Sign In
The procoagulant pattern of patients with COVID‐19 acute respiratory distress syndrome
Author(s): ,
Marco Ranucci
Affiliations:
Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
Director of Clinical Research of the, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
Andrea Ballotta
,
Andrea Ballotta
Affiliations:
Umberto Di Dedda
,
Umberto Di Dedda
Affiliations:
Ekaterina Bayshnikova
,
Ekaterina Bayshnikova
Affiliations:
Marco Dei Poli
,
Marco Dei Poli
Affiliations:
Marco Resta
,
Marco Resta
Affiliations:
Mara Falco
,
Mara Falco
Affiliations:
Gianni Albano
,
Gianni Albano
Affiliations:
Lorenzo Menicanti
Lorenzo Menicanti
Affiliations:
ISTH Academy. Ranucci M. 04/17/20; 293246
Prof. Marco Ranucci
Prof. Marco Ranucci
Contributions
Journal Abstract
Abstract
Background
Few observations exist with respect to the pro‐coagulant profile of patients with COVID‐19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Reports of thromboembolic complications are scarce but suggestive for a clinical relevance of the problem. Objectives
Prospective observational study aimed to characterize the coagulation profile of COVID‐19 ARDS patients with standard and viscoelastic coagulation tests, and to evaluate their changes after establishment of an aggressive thromboprophylaxis. Methods
Sixteen patients with COVID‐19 ARDS received a complete coagulation profile at the admission in the intensive care unit. Ten patients were followed in the subsequent 7 days, after increasing the dose of low molecular weight heparin, antithrombin levels correction, and clopidogrel in selected cases. Results
At baseline, the patients showed a pro‐coagulant profile characterized by an increased clot strength (CS, median 55 hPa, 95% interquartile range 35‐63), platelet contribution to CS (PCS, 43 hPa, interquartile range 24‐45), fibrinogen contribution to CS (FCS, 12 hPa, interquartile range 6‐13.5 elevated D‐dimer levels (5.5 μg/mL, interquartile range 2.5‐6.5), hyperfibrinogenemia (794 mg/dL, interquartile range 583‐933). Fibrinogen levels were associated (R2=0.506, P=0.003) with interleukin‐6 values. After increasing the thromboprophylaxis, there was a significant (P=0.001) time‐related decrease of fibrinogen levels, D‐dimers (P=0.017), CS (P=0.013), PCS (P=0.035) and FCS (P=0.038). Conclusion
The pro‐coagulant pattern of these patients may justify the clinical reports of thromboembolic complications (pulmonary embolism) during the course of the disease. Further studies are needed to assess the best prophylaxis and treatment of this condition.

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies